This is what makes a story relatable. However, if I wrote about what I know and have it portray the message I've chosen, it would come off a little like Catcher in the Rye meets Pride and Prejudice. Initially it doesn't sound too bad, except they are two books every girl has already read and already feels is the amalgamation of the single, 22 and under set.
The problem is not the characterization, but the source of conflict. If the biggest problem I can conjure up is relationship issue, it seems too shallow to me. The journey of post-collegiate years to age 25 is also a very moving era in life that, put into words, could be captivating, but it's just a series of events, jobs, financial issues and the eternal question of "when should I settle down?". It's still a relationship issue, focusing on one's relationship with self. A bit self-centered, don't you think?
Maybe this is why there are no more amazing stories. Almost all new fiction releases are just regurgitated from classic novels. I seriously doubt there is going to be an AP Literature question about The DaVinci Code. Message, symbolism, intricate puzzles meant for us to decipher; not exactly the stuff that Stephanie Meyer puts in her books.
Has it all been done? If so, what is left for us to contribute?
No comments:
Post a Comment